Vendor/Product |
Does the System support actual and
prospective testing? |
What methodologies are
supported? |
Alterna Technologies Group Inc.
Auros
|
Yes |
Dollar offset/ratio for both prospective
and actual effectives.
Additional effectiveness testing methods
are being added. The sequence of implementing
additional calculation methods is determined along
with our customers. |
Selkirk Financial Technologies,
Inc.
Treasury Manager™ |
Yes |
Dollar offset/ratio for both prospective
and actual.
Additional methods are available with
results calculated externally. |
FXpress Corp.
FXpress™ |
Yes |
Dollar offset/ratio for both prospective
and actual (cumulative or period by period).
Projected rate scenarios can be saved and used for
prospective effectiveness testing. Additional
statistical methods for prospective effectiveness
will be supported in a future
update |
INNSINC
Futrak 2000 |
Yes |
Dollar offset/ratio for both. (Futrak® 2000
uses the Change in Variable Cash Flow Method (see
Method 1 - Statement 133 Implementation Issue No.
G7) |
SunGard Treasury Systems
GTM |
Yes |
At present, users have the choice of six
different methodologies. The first two are
periodic and cumulative dollar offset. The other
four are proprietary and meant to address the
shortcomings of dollar offset. |
Integrity Treasury
Solutions
integra-T |
Yes |
Index correlation and regression: verifying
that coefficient of correlation is greater than
0.9 or a user specified value and/or verifying
that the R-square of a linear regression is
greater than 0.8 or user specified
value.
Ratio Test: verifying that the gain/loss on
derivative and the hedged risk are offsetting and
the ratio of their magnitudes are within the
80-125% range or other user specified
range.
Short Cut Method: Validation of terms
prescribed by the standard.
Critical Terms Matching: Validation of
terms that verify an assumption of "No
Ineffectiveness" for hedges that don't qualify for
the Shortcut Method (e.g. FX
hedges) |
Open Link Financial
Endur/Findur |
Yes |
Endur and Findur are fully integrated
trading and risk management systems. Accordingly,
we support rolling VaR (monte carlo and/or
parametric), Duration, Simulation and Scenario
Shock (what-if), Delta Value, etc. for the
calculation oustomize effectiveness calculations.
All necessary data is stored in the database and
can be used with the FAS Analyzer to determine
effectiveness |
FinancialCAD® Corporation
The Perfect Hedge (formerly fincad.com)
|
Yes |
Prospective method supported is a variance
reduction method.
Retrospective method supported is dollar
offset/ratio. |
SunGard Treasury Systems
Quantum |
Yes |
The System supports dollar offset and
regression. |
SAP
CFM |
Only actual (no prospective).
|
Dollar offset/raio, based on spot values,
cash flow differences forward, cash flow
differences forward discounted/ all either using
clean values (i.e. taking interest accruals into
account) or not, FX option intrinsic value based
on spot rates, option intrinsic value based on
forward rates, option intrinsic value based on
forward discounted rates, present value (clean
price or nonclean), benchmark (again, clean or
not). |
Principia Partners
Principia Analytic Systems
(PAS) |
Yes |
Method is dependent on the needs of the
client; the system can handle a wide variety of
methods including retrospective hedge analysis,
dollar offset, etc. |
XRT
Treasury Workstation (TWS) and
Globe$ |
Yes |
Dollar offset/ratio for both. (System
supports ability select effectiveness testing and
valuation using spot-spot or forward-forward
methods.) |
Trema Treasury Management
Finance Kit |
Yes |
Dollar offset. Or, for prospective
effectiveness, the system can run reports to show
that the critical terms match (for relevant cases,
e.g. FX risk hedge with forward), or we can take a
hedge relationship and run it through simulation.
For example, for a FX risk hedge, we can simulate
the effect of FX rate change +/-5% (or any
user-defined range) and the system returns the
calculated values for both the hedge and the
hedged item at selected intervals (...-1%, -0.5%,
+0.5%, +1%...), allowing us to prove that the
values will offset each other. Similarly, we can
simulate the effect of e.g. Libor change on the
future values of IRS hedge and hedged debt
instrument. |
Reval.com |
Yes |
Dollar offset method, on the basis of:
Spot, Forward, Intrinsic Value, Minimum Value and
Full Fair Market Value Method. Can support
effectiveness testing using user defined and
performed regression methodologies.
|
Wall Street Systems
Wall Street Systems® |
Yes |
The dollar offset method for prospective
and actual effectives. For prospective, the
application calculates the present value (PV) of
all future cash flows as well as maintains the
historical change in actual values. For
retrospective assessment, the user has the chose
to elect to compare the actual change in values,
actual change in floating leg cash flow values,
and even the actual change in the fixed leg cash
flows. For prospective assessment the application
uses the PV of the future cash flows.
|